This biography explores the life and work of René Descartes, one of the most influential figures in Western philosophy and science. Our discussion begins with his birth, continues with his education, military service, and travels across Europe. We discuss his groundbreaking contributions to philosophy, mathematics, and physics, including his development of Cartesian doubt, the Cartesian coordinate system, and mechanistic physics; all are examined in detail. The biography also delves into Descartes' personal life, his relationships, and the circumstances of his death in 1650. The narrative is enriched by a discussion of Descartes' posthumous reputation and the enduring influence of his ideas.
I. Introduction
Few figures in history loom as large as René Descartes. A man of prodigious intellect and unyielding curiosity, Descartes stands as a beacon of Enlightenment, his ideas illuminating the path from the medieval to the modern world. His philosophical and scientific contributions have shaped our understanding of the universe and our place within it; his influence reverberating through the corridors of time.
II. Early Life and Education
René Descartes was born on the 31st of March, 1596, in the modest town of La Haye en Touraine, France. Descartes was destined for greatness, a destiny that was far from apparent in his humble beginnings (Clarke, 2006). His birthplace, now fittingly renamed Descartes in his honor, was far removed from the bustling intellectual centers of Paris and Montpellier, yet it was here that one of the greatest minds of the modern era was nurtured.
Descartes was born into a family of some standing. His father, Joachim Descartes, was a councilor in the provincial parliament, a position that conferred upon the family a rank in the lower nobility (Clarke, 2006). His mother, Jeanne Brochard, was the daughter of a prominent lawyer. However, Descartes' early life was marked by tragedy. His mother died in May 1597, when he was just over a year old, a loss that would cast a long shadow over his childhood (Clarke, 2006).
Following his mother's death, the young Descartes was left in the care of his father and his maternal grandmother, Jeanne Sain Brochard. His father, preoccupied with his duties in the provincial parliament and often away in Rennes, played a somewhat distant role in his upbringing. It was his grandmother who largely oversaw his early years, providing the young Descartes with his first taste of education and instilling in him a love of learning (Clarke, 2006).
Descartes also had an older brother and sister, Pierre and Jeanne, but he was the only child of his mother's to survive past infancy. This early brush with mortality, coupled with his mother's death, may have contributed to Descartes' lifelong interest in medicine and the desire to uncover the secrets of life and death (Clarke, 2006).
Despite these early hardships, or perhaps because of them, Descartes developed into a keen and curious child, displaying an intellectual appetite that hinted at his future brilliance. His health was delicate, a trait that would persist into adulthood, and he was often plagued by bouts of ill health. Yet, these periods of sickness, which often confined him to bed, also provided him with ample time for thought and reflection, nurturing his burgeoning intellectual prowess (Clarke, 2006).
In these early years, the foundations were laid for the man Descartes would become - the thinker who would question the established truths of his time, pioneer a new method of inquiry, and forever alter the course of philosophy and science. His humble beginnings in La Haye en Touraine were just the start of a remarkable journey that would lead him to become one of the most influential figures in human history (Clarke, 2006).
In the grand halls of the College of La Flèche, a Jesuit institution of considerable repute, René Descartes embarked upon his intellectual odyssey. The Jesuits, esteemed for their pedagogical prowess, steeped young Descartes in the classical teachings of Aristotle and Aquinas, the stalwarts of the scholastic tradition (Zimmerelli, 2015). This method of learning, a veritable crucible of logic, dialectic, and commentary on the classical texts, was the bedrock of his education.
Yet, even as he imbibed the wisdom of these intellectual titans, Descartes exhibited the stirrings of a mind that would not be tethered by the confines of established thought. He was not a passive receptacle of knowledge, content to accept the wisdom of the ages without question. Instead, he probed and questioned, seeking to unearth the principles and assumptions that undergirded the knowledge he was being imparted. This intellectual restlessness, this insatiable thirst for knowledge that transcended the boundaries of traditional scholasticism, was a harbinger of the philosophical method that Descartes would later pioneer (Zimmerelli, 2015).
Upon the completion of his tutelage at La Flèche, Descartes found himself within the hallowed halls of the University of Poitiers, enrolling in the study of law, a path befitting a gentleman of his station. Yet, the study of jurisprudence, while an honorable pursuit, did little to ignite the fires of passion within Descartes' heart. His true calling lay not in the labyrinthine intricacies of legal codes, but in the boundless expanse of the intellectual cosmos, in the ceaseless quest for knowledge and understanding (Gaukroger, 1995).
His tenure at Poitiers, while lacking the intellectual fervor of his years at La Flèche, nevertheless played a pivotal role in shaping his intellectual trajectory. It introduced him to a different mode of thought, one that prized practical judgment and the application of principles to concrete cases. This exposure to the pragmatic aspects of knowledge would later permeate his philosophical and scientific endeavors, marrying abstract reasoning with a meticulous examination of the natural world (Gaukroger, 1995).
In these formative years, Descartes was not a mere vessel to be filled with knowledge. Rather, he was an active architect of his own intellectual edifice, ceaselessly questioning, exploring, and pushing against the boundaries of his understanding. His early education, steeped as it was in the scholastic tradition, also kindled the flames of his intellectual independence and honed his critical thinking skills. These attributes would prove invaluable in his later philosophical and scientific explorations, empowering him to challenge the intellectual orthodoxy of his time and chart a new course in the annals of human thought (Gaukroger, 1995).
III. Military Service and Travels
Upon completion of his studies at the University of Poitiers, René Descartes embarked on a new chapter of his life, one that would significantly shape his intellectual trajectory (Clarke, 2006). He enlisted in the army of Prince Maurice of Nassau, a renowned military strategist and an advocate of scientific methods in warfare. This decision marked the beginning of Descartes' journey into the wider world, far beyond the confines of the classroom.
Descartes' military service was not driven by a desire for martial glory, but rather by a thirst for knowledge and experience (Gaukroger, 2002). He saw in the army a microcosm of life, a stage where the dramas of human existence played out in their most intense and stark forms. The battlefield, in Descartes' view, was a crucible of character, a place where the abstract ideas he had studied could be tested against the harsh realities of life and death.
During his time in the army, Descartes was exposed to a wide range of experiences and ideas. He traveled extensively, participating in various campaigns across Europe (Clarke, 2006). These travels took him to the Netherlands, Germany, and Hungary, among other places. He encountered diverse cultures and ways of thinking, which broadened his intellectual horizons and challenged his preconceived notions.
Descartes' military service also provided him with practical insights into the application of scientific principles (Gaukroger, 2002). Prince Maurice of Nassau was known for his innovative use of science and technology in warfare, and this likely influenced Descartes' thinking. He saw firsthand how mathematical principles could be applied to the design of fortifications and the trajectory of cannonballs, experiences that would later inform his work in physics and engineering.
Moreover, the discipline and rigor of military life had a profound impact on Descartes (Clarke, 2006). The need for precision and accuracy, the importance of strategy and planning, the interplay of theory and practice - all these aspects of military service resonated with Descartes and shaped his approach to philosophy and science. He came to see the pursuit of knowledge as a kind of intellectual warfare, a battle against ignorance and uncertainty (Gaukroger, 2002).
Isaac Beeckman
During this time, Descartes crossed paths with Isaac Beeckman, a meeting of minds that would have a significant, albeit brief, impact on the intellectual trajectory of both men (Gaukroger, 2002). Beeckman, a Dutch philosopher and scientist of considerable repute, played a crucial role in rekindling Descartes' interest in science and mathematics (Clarke, 2006).
The two men met in the city of Breda, in the Netherlands, in the year 1618, when Descartes was serving in the military (Gaukroger, 2002). Beeckman was one of the first to recognize the exceptional mathematical talent that lay dormant in Descartes. They engaged in numerous philosophical and scientific discussions, and Beeckman encouraged Descartes to pursue his studies in these fields (Clarke, 2006).
Descartes and Beeckman collaborated on several scientific problems. For instance, they worked together on the problem of free fall, which led Descartes to develop his laws of motion (Gaukroger, 2002). Descartes also shared with Beeckman his method of applying algebra to geometry, a method that would later become known as Cartesian geometry (Clarke, 2006).
However, their relationship soured over time. Descartes began to distance himself from Beeckman, and in his later writings, he downplayed Beeckman's influence on his work (Gaukroger, 2002). Some historians speculate that Descartes' desire to be seen as an original thinker led him to minimize the contributions of others, including Beeckman (Clarke, 2006).
Despite the eventual deterioration of their relationship, Beeckman's influence on Descartes was significant. Their collaboration marked a pivotal point in Descartes' intellectual development and set him on the path to becoming one of the most influential philosophers and scientists of the modern era (Gaukroger, 2002).
Descartes' military service was far from a mere interlude in his life. It was a formative period that expanded his worldview, honed his intellectual skills, and set the stage for his later philosophical and scientific breakthroughs (Clarke, 2006). The experiences and insights he gained during this time left an indelible mark on his thinking, influencing the development of his groundbreaking ideas (Gaukroger, 2002).
IV. Philosophical and Scientific Contributions
René Descartes' philosophical and scientific contributions stand as a monumental edifice in the landscape of human thought (Matthews, 2013). His ideas, revolutionary in their time, have shaped the contours of modern philosophy and science, providing the foundation upon which subsequent generations of thinkers have built their theories and hypotheses (Kusukawa, 1992). Descartes' work represents a seismic shift in the way we approach knowledge and understanding, marking the transition from the medieval worldview to the modern one (Pirozhkova, n.d.).
Discourse on the Method
René Descartes' "Discourse on the Method" stands as a beacon in the history of philosophy, a work of such profound import that it forever altered the course of intellectual inquiry (Clarke, 2006). Published in the year of our Lord 1637, it marked a radical departure from the traditional methods of philosophical inquiry that had held sway over the intellectual landscape for centuries. Rather than acquiescing to the established truths of his time, Descartes proposed a new method of inquiry, one that championed the power of individual reason and the pursuit of truth through systematic doubt.
This method, often referred to as Cartesian doubt, involves subjecting all beliefs, ideas, and knowledge to rigorous scrutiny, accepting as true only what is absolutely certain and indubitable (Gaukroger, 2002). Descartes' goal was to sweep away the uncertainties and ambiguities of the past and to establish a firm and reliable foundation for knowledge. This approach, revolutionary in its time, challenged the authority of tradition and invited individuals to think for themselves, to become the architects of their own intellectual edifices (Clarke, 2006).
At the heart of Descartes' method lies his famous dictum, "Cogito, ergo sum" - "I think, therefore I am." This statement, simple in its formulation yet profound in its implications, encapsulates Descartes' philosophy (Cottingham, 1986). It asserts that the very act of doubting one's existence serves as proof of one's existence. Even if we doubt everything else, we cannot doubt the fact that we are doubting, and therefore, we must exist as thinking beings. This insight provides the indubitable foundation upon which all other knowledge can be built.
Descartes' emphasis on the power of reason and the pursuit of truth through systematic doubt had far-reaching implications. It not only transformed the landscape of philosophy but also had a profound impact on the development of science (Gaukroger, 2002). Descartes' method encouraged scientists to question the accepted theories of their time and to seek empirical evidence for their claims. This approach, which lies at the heart of the scientific method, has driven the progress of science and the expansion of our understanding of the natural world.
Meditations on First Philosophy
René Descartes' "Meditations on First Philosophy" stands as a veritable colossus in the annals of Western philosophy, a profound exploration of the most fundamental questions of existence (Clarke, 2006). Published in the year of our Lord 1641, this work plunges deep into the unfathomable depths of metaphysical territory, probing the nature of reality, the existence of God, and the enigmatic relationship between the mind and the body. It is within the pages of this seminal work that Descartes fully unfurls his method of systematic doubt, a rigorous intellectual exercise aimed at discarding all beliefs that can be doubted and establishing a firm foundation for genuine knowledge (Gaukroger, 2002).
The "Meditations" commence with Descartes casting aside all of his previous beliefs, embarking on a quest to establish a set of truths that are certain and indubitable. He famously arrives at the conclusion that the one thing he cannot doubt is his own existence as a thinking being, encapsulated in the immortal phrase "Cogito, ergo sum" - "I think, therefore I am" (Clarke, 2006). This profound realization serves as the bedrock upon which Descartes constructs the edifice of his philosophy.
In the "Meditations," Descartes also grapples with the existence of God, a question that has perplexed philosophers and theologians for millennia. He presents several arguments for God's existence, including the ontological argument, which posits that the very idea of a perfect being necessarily implies its existence (Gaukroger, 2002). For Descartes, the existence of God is not a matter of faith, but a certainty, a cornerstone of his metaphysical system. He holds the belief that a benevolent God would not deceive us, thus providing a guarantee for the reliability of our clear and distinct perceptions (Clarke, 2006).
The "Meditations" also delve into the mind-body problem, a conundrum that has puzzled philosophers for centuries. Descartes proposes a form of substance dualism, positing that the mind and body are fundamentally different types of substances: the mind is a non-physical entity capable of reasoning and doubting, while the body is a physical entity occupying space (Cottingham, 1986). This dualistic view has been highly influential, igniting centuries of debate and discussion about the nature of consciousness and the mind-body relationship.
Principles of Philosophy
René Descartes' "Principles of Philosophy," a monumental work published in the year of our Lord 1644, stands as a testament to his audacious attempt to construct a comprehensive philosophical system that elucidates the intricate workings of the universe (Gaukroger, 2002). This magnum opus, a reflection of Descartes' indefatigable scientific spirit, embodies his fervent desire to apply the principles of clear and distinct reasoning to the mysteries of the natural world. It is within the pages of this seminal work that Descartes meticulously lays out his views on a panoply of topics, ranging from the lofty realms of metaphysics to the tangible world of physics, in a manner that is both systematic and comprehensive.
The "Principles" commence with a foray into the realm of metaphysics, where Descartes reiterates his cogent arguments for the existence of God and the distinction between the mind and body, ideas that form the bedrock of his philosophical system (Clarke, 2006). From the ethereal heights of metaphysics, Descartes then descends into the domain of physics, where he outlines his vision of the universe as a vast, intricate machine governed by the immutable laws of mathematics. In Descartes' cosmos, the universe is a purely material and mechanistic entity, with all physical phenomena explained in terms of matter in motion (Gaukroger, 2002).
Within the "Principles," Descartes also presents his own laws of nature, which serve as his unique interpretation of what we now refer to as the laws of physics. These laws include the principle of inertia, a revolutionary concept that posits a body at rest tends to remain at rest, and a body in motion tends to continue in motion. This groundbreaking idea, novel in its time, laid the foundation for Newton's first law of motion, a cornerstone of modern physics (Westfall, 1980).
In the "Principles," Descartes also embarks on a grand tour of the Earth and the cosmos, offering explanations for a myriad of natural phenomena, from the formation of celestial bodies to the ethereal nature of light. While some of his scientific theories have been superseded by the relentless march of scientific progress, Descartes' emphasis on clear and distinct ideas and his application of mathematical principles to the natural world have left an indelible mark on the development of science (Gaukroger, 2002). His "Principles of Philosophy" stands as a testament to his vision of a universe governed by rational laws, a vision that continues to shape our understanding of the world.
Mathematics
In the grand tapestry of human thought, René Descartes occupies a place of singular distinction. His contributions to the realm of mathematics are of such magnitude and profundity that they can only be described as revolutionary (Gaukroger, 2002). The Cartesian coordinate system, a testament to his innovative genius, has fundamentally reshaped the mathematical landscape, serving as a bridge between the seemingly disparate realms of algebra and geometry.
Prior to Descartes, algebra and geometry were viewed as separate provinces within the kingdom of mathematics. Algebra, with its equations and unknowns, and geometry, with its shapes and spaces, seemed to inhabit different worlds. Yet, Descartes, with his keen intellect and visionary insight, discerned a deep connection between these two fields (Bell, 1945). He realized that the abstract figures of geometry could be represented in the concrete language of algebra, and that the cryptic equations of algebra could be visualized in the tangible forms of geometry. This groundbreaking insight gave birth to the Cartesian coordinate system, a potent tool that enables us to navigate the intricate pathways between algebraic and geometric representations (Boyer, 1949).
The implications of Descartes' coordinate system are as far-reaching as they are profound. It has not only enriched our understanding of mathematics but also paved the way for the development of calculus and the mathematical modeling of physical phenomena (Boyer, 1949). Today, the Cartesian coordinate system is a cornerstone of numerous fields, from the lofty realms of physics and engineering to the practical domains of computer graphics and navigation.
Yet, Descartes' intellectual prowess was not confined to the realm of mathematics. He also made significant strides in the field of physics, offering a mechanistic view of the universe that boldly challenged the Aristotelian orthodoxy of his time (Gaukroger, 2002). According to Descartes, the universe operates not as a divine stage where celestial bodies move according to divine will, but as a colossal machine, governed by the immutable laws of physics. This view marked a radical departure from the Aristotelian conception of the universe, which posited a fundamental dichotomy between the terrestrial and celestial realms (Grant, 1996).
Descartes' mechanistic physics proposed that all physical phenomena, from the majestic motion of planets to the ethereal behavior of light, can be explained in terms of matter in motion (Gaukroger, 2002). He developed his own laws of motion and offered a novel theory of light and color. While some of his specific theories have been superseded by the relentless march of scientific progress, Descartes' mechanistic approach to physics has left an indelible mark. It laid the groundwork for the scientific revolution and the development of modern physics, setting the stage for the monumental work of later luminaries like Isaac Newton (Westfall, 1980).
V. Descartes and Religion
In the grand theatre of human thought, René Descartes stands as a figure of monumental import, a man whose revolutionary ideas have shaped the contours of modern philosophy and science. Yet, despite the radical nature of his ideas, Descartes was no iconoclast. Far from seeking to overthrow the established order, he sought to reconcile the seemingly disparate realms of science and religion, viewing his scientific inquiries as a means to understand, rather than undermine, the divine creation (Clarke, 2006).
Descartes, in his profound wisdom, saw no inherent conflict between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the tenets of faith. To him, the universe was a grand book, written in the language of mathematics, and science was the means by which we decipher its divine script. His scientific inquiries were, in essence, a form of worship, a way of appreciating the intricate beauty and order of God's creation (Gaukroger, 2006).
Yet, the Church, steeped in tradition and wary of the burgeoning scientific revolution, viewed Descartes' mechanistic philosophy with suspicion. His portrayal of the universe as a vast machine, governed by physical laws rather than divine intervention, was seen as a challenge to the Church's authority, a threat to the established worldview (Osler, 2004).
The trial of Galileo, a contemporary of Descartes, cast a long and ominous shadow over Descartes' later years. Galileo's condemnation by the Church for his heliocentric views served as a stark reminder of the perils of challenging ecclesiastical authority. This event, no doubt, influenced Descartes' decision to withhold some of his works from publication, including "Le Monde," his treatise on physics and cosmology (Dear, 2006).
Despite his revolutionary ideas, René Descartes was a man of his time, navigating the treacherous waters between science and religion. His life and work serve as a testament to the complex interplay between these two realms, a reminder of the challenges and controversies that marked the dawn of the modern age (Watson, 2007).
VI. Personal Life
René Descartes, the man behind the philosophy, was a figure as complex and multifaceted as the ideas he espoused. Known for his solitary habits, he often sought refuge in the quietude of his own thoughts, spending long hours in contemplation.
Among the lesser-known facets of Descartes' life are a few intriguing anecdotes:
Descartes was known to be a late riser, a habit he justified by claiming that the tranquility and warmth of his bed provided the ideal conditions for contemplation. It is said that his famous philosophical axiom, "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am"), was conceived during one of these morning reveries (Clarke, 2006).
Descartes claimed that the genesis of his groundbreaking philosophy came to him in a series of dreams or visions on the night of November 10, 1619. He interpreted these dreams as a divine sign, a celestial mandate that he was destined to create a universal science of wisdom (Watson, 2007).
His personal life was marked by a few close relationships, most notably with Helena Jans van der Strom, a maid with whom he scandalously had a daughter in 1635 named Francine. She tragically died of scarlet fever at the age of five in 1640. Her death was a loss that deeply affected Descartes. Prior to her death, he had plans to provide her with a perfectly rational education, a progressive idea considering the time period (Watson, 2007).
Descartes was a man of travel. He served in the military and traveled extensively throughout Europe. His travels and interactions with people of different cultures and backgrounds greatly influenced his philosophical thoughts (Clarke, 2006).
After the trial of Galileo in 1633, Descartes became fearful of being persecuted by the church for his scientific and philosophical ideas. He decided not to publish his treatise "The World," in which he supported the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun (Watson, 2007).
VII. Later Life and Death
The twilight years of René Descartes were a period of unceasing intellectual ferment, marked by continued productivity and burgeoning recognition. Yet, they were not without their share of controversy and challenges. The philosopher, ever the seeker of truth, grappled with complex questions till the end of his days, his mind a battlefield where ideas were constantly examined, dissected, and reassembled (Watson, 2007).
One of the most illuminating episodes of this period was Descartes' correspondence with Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia. The princess, a woman of considerable intellect and curiosity, engaged Descartes in a series of letters that delved into the heart of his philosophy. Their correspondence, which spanned several years, offers a fascinating glimpse into Descartes' thought process and his attempts to elucidate his ideas (Nadler, 2013).
Central to their discussions was the mind-body problem, a philosophical conundrum that Descartes had wrestled with throughout his career. Descartes' dualistic view posited that the mind and body were distinct entities, a notion that Elisabeth found difficult to reconcile with the evident interactions between the two. In his letters, Descartes attempted to clarify his views, proposing that while the mind and body were distinct, they could interact through the pineal gland, a small organ he believed to be the "principal seat of the soul" (Nadler, 2013).
Yet, Elisabeth remained unconvinced, pushing Descartes to refine his ideas and explore new avenues of thought. Their correspondence, thus, was not a one-sided lecture but a dynamic exchange of ideas, a testament to the intellectual rigor and openness of both correspondents (Nadler, 2013).
Descartes' letters to Elisabeth reveal a philosopher in his element, grappling with complex questions, defending his ideas, and striving for clarity and understanding. They offer a window into the workings of his mind, showcasing his intellectual agility and his unwavering commitment to the pursuit of truth. Even in his later years, Descartes remained a consummate philosopher, his mind a crucible of ceaseless intellectual activity (Watson, 2007).
René Descartes' final years were spent in Stockholm, at the court of Queen Christina of Sweden. The Queen, an ardent admirer of Descartes' work, had invited him to provide her with philosophical tutoring. However, the conditions of his stay in Sweden were far from ideal. The Queen insisted on having her lessons at 5 a.m., a time when Descartes would usually be in the midst of his morning contemplations. The early hours, coupled with the harsh Swedish winter, were a stark departure from Descartes' usual routine, and they took a toll on his health. He fell ill with pneumonia and died on February 11, 1650 (Clarke, 2006).
Descartes' personal life was marked by a few close relationships, most notably with Helena Jans van der Strom, a maid with whom he had a daughter, Francine, during his residence in Amsterdam. Francine was born in 1635 and tragically died of scarlet fever at the age of five in 1640. This relationship and the birth of his daughter were not widely known during Descartes' lifetime and only came to light after his death (Rodis-Lewis, 1998).
As for the fate of Descartes' remains, they have indeed had a tumultuous history. After his death in Sweden, his body was initially buried at the Adolf Fredriks Church in Stockholm. However, 16 years later, his remains were exhumed and transported to France, where they were reinterred at the Saint-Étienne-du-Mont church in Paris. His skull, however, was separated from the rest of his body and passed through the hands of several private owners before it was finally returned to the rest of his remains in 1821 (Gaukroger, 1995).
VIII. Conclusion
René Descartes' legacy is as enduring as it is profound. His philosophical and scientific ideas have shaped the course of human thought, his influence felt in every corner of the intellectual landscape. He was a man of his time, yet his ideas transcend time, speaking to us across the centuries. His life, marked by relentless inquiry and intellectual courage, stands as a testament to the power of the human mind to comprehend the mysteries of the universe.
In the grand tapestry of human history, Descartes occupies a place of honor. His contributions to philosophy, mathematics, and science are pillars upon which our modern world stands. His life and work serve as a beacon, illuminating the path of intellectual inquiry and reminding us of the power of reason in our quest for truth. As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, the Cartesian legacy continues to guide us, a testament to the enduring relevance of his ideas.
Bibliography:
- Bell, E. T. (1945). The Development of Mathematics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Boyer, C. B. (1949). The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. New York: Dover Publications.
- Clarke, D. (2006). Descartes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cottingham, J. (1986). Descartes. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Dear, P. (2006). The Intelligibility of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (1995). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (2002). Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gaukroger, S. (2006). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Grant, E. (1996). Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kusukawa, S. (1992). Science, optics and music in medieval and early modern thought. British Journal for the History of Science. https://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472599483
- Matthews, M. R. (2013). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8
- Nadler, S. (2013). The Philosopher, the Princess, and the Pea. The New York Times.
- Osler, M. (2004). Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pirozhkova, S. (n.d.). Philosophy’s Contribution to Human Capital Development of Researchers: Current State and Prospective Agenda. Polylogos. https://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s258770110019384-4
- Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1998). Descartes: His Life and Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Watson, R. (2007). Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Life of René Descartes. Boston: David R. Godine.
- Westfall, R. S. (1980). Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zimmerelli, L. (2015). A Bridge to Somewhere: A Case Study of Tutor Education and Community Engagement. The Writing Center Journal, 35(1), 59-73. Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1797&context=wcj
